New Jersey Steel and Iron Company v. Robinson
The New Jersey Steel and Iron Company, Appellant and Respondent, v. Andrew J. Robinson, Defendant, Charles N. Talbot, as Assignee, Et Al., Respondents and Appellants, Paul Pfotenhauer Et Al., Appellants, and Francis S. Kinney Et Al., Respondents
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Werner, J.
We shall content ourselves with a brief statement of our conclusions herein, since it would be unprofitable to do more.
1. Upon the appeal of the plaintiff and the other lienors from the order of the Appellate Division reversing so much of the judgment entered upon the report of the referee as adjudged that the liens were prior and paramount to the claim of Talbot as assignee of Robinson, we reverse the order of the Appellate Division and affirm the judgment entered upon the referee’s report, with the costs and allowances therein specified *634 and with costs of this appeal payable out of the fund.
(Kane Co.
v. Kinney, 174 N. Y. 69 .)
2. Upon the appeal of the defendants Barr, Thaw and Fraser, and the American National Exchange Bank, from the order of the Appellate Division, reversing so much of the judgment entered upon the referee’s report as adjudged the lien of Barr, Thaw and Fraser, and the claim thereunder of the American National Exchange Bank, valid as against the lien of the plaintiff, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division, with costs to the plaintiff respondent payable out of the fund.
(Bradley & Currier Co.
v. Pacheteau, 175 N. Y. 492 .)
3. Upon the appeal of the plaintiff from the order of the Appellate Division modifying the judgment entered upon the referee’s report as to the amount earned and unpaid upon Robinson’s contract at the time of filing the liens herein, and as to the amount of interest payable thereon, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division, with costs to the respondent Kinney payable out of the fund.
Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin and Cullen, JJ., concur; Haight, J., absent.
Judgment accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.