TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith v. Coe

Lucretia C. Smith, Etc. v. . Timothy J. Coe

Smith v. Coe, 55 N.Y. 678 (1874)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 3, 1874
Citations
55 N.Y. 6781874 N.Y. LEXIS 68
Cited by 11

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 680 CHURCH, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1889: 11890: 11891: 11892: 21893: 11899: 11901: 11904: 21945: 118892026peak 1892 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gray v. Richmond Bicycle Co.60 N.E. 663 (N.Y. 1901)
  2. Herbert v. Dufur32 P. 302 (Or. 1893)
  3. Royce Haulage Corp. v. Bronx Terminal Garage, Inc.185 Misc. 892 (1945)
  4. Weller v. Hilderbrandt101 N.W. 1108 (S.D. 1904)
  5. Sproull v. Star Co.45 A.D. 575 (1899)
  6. Citroen v. Adam5 N.Y.S. 669 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1889)

Most recent

  1. Royce Haulage Corp. v. Bronx Terminal Garage, Inc.185 Misc. 892 (1945)
  2. Weller v. Hilderbrandt101 N.W. 1108 (S.D. 1904)
  3. Norton v. Shields132 F. 873 (S.D.N.Y. 1904)
  4. Gray v. Richmond Bicycle Co.60 N.E. 663 (N.Y. 1901)
  5. Sproull v. Star Co.45 A.D. 575 (1899)
  6. Herbert v. Dufur32 P. 302 (Or. 1893)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list