TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Deutsch v. Roy

Siegfried Deutsch, Respondent, v. Flores B. Roy Et Al., Appellants, Impleaded With Others

Deutsch v. Roy, 199 N.E. 510 (N.Y. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 19, 1935
Citations
199 N.E. 510269 N.Y. 5081935 N.Y. LEXIS 813

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ. Not sitting: Finch, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11943: 11959: 11983: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Toho Bussan Kaisha, Limited v. American President Lines, Limited265 F.2d 418 (2d Cir. 1959)
  2. Matinzi v. Joy96 A.D.2d 780 (1983) · Dissent
  3. Goldfarb v. Wright265 A.D. 738 (1943)
  4. Russo v. Sofia Bros., Inc.44 F. Supp. 779 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Matinzi v. Joy96 A.D.2d 780 (1983) · Dissent
  2. Toho Bussan Kaisha, Limited v. American President Lines, Limited265 F.2d 418 (2d Cir. 1959)
  3. Goldfarb v. Wright265 A.D. 738 (1943)
  4. Russo v. Sofia Bros., Inc.44 F. Supp. 779 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list