TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Proving the Will of Berry

In the Matter of Proving the Will of Inslee H. Berry, Deceased. Sarah C. McCamly, Appellant; Lutheran Hospital of Manhattan, Respondent

In re Proving the Will of Berry, 102 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 20, 1913
Citations
102 N.E. 1099209 N.Y. 5401913 N.Y. LEXIS 904
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 10,1913, which reversed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court in so far as it declared invalid the tenth clause of will of Inslee H. Berry, deceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1916: 11917: 31918: 11919: 11920: 11924: 11925: 11929: 11933: 11934: 11939: 11941: 119162026peak 1917 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Woolley v. Hutchins114 Misc. 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1920)
  2. In re Hornidge135 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  3. In re the Probate of Will of Hitchcock118 N.E. 220 (N.Y. 1917)
  4. In re the Estate of Stulman146 Misc. 861 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1933)
  5. Maynard v. Maynard108 Misc. 362 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1919)
  6. Benedict v. Salmon177 A.D. 385 (1917)

Most recent

  1. Booge v. Reinicke114 P.2d 427 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
  2. In re Gordon256 A.D. 999 (1939)
  3. In re the Estate of Innerfield153 Misc. 706 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1934)
  4. In re the Estate of Stulman146 Misc. 861 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1933)
  5. In re Hornidge135 Misc. 170 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1929)
  6. In re Vert126 Misc. 220 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list