Fortuna v. Murdock
In the Matter of Vito Fortuna, Respondent, Against Harris H. Murdock Et Al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants. Morris Roth, Intervener, Appellant
Fortuna v. Murdock, 24 N.E.2d 21 (N.Y. 1939)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Lohghran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O’Brien, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.