TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sturz v. Leo

Karl Sturz, Appellant and Respondent, v. Michael J. Leo, Respondent and Appellant

Sturz v. Leo, 7 N.E.2d 687 (N.Y. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 9, 1937
Citations
7 N.E.2d 687273 N.Y. 5501937 N.Y. LEXIS 1290

Opinion of the Court

*552 Judgment of the Appellate Division modified by striking out the items of $1,200 and $564.62, aggregating $1,764.62, with interest from July 1, 1932, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division had no power to increase a verdict reduced by stipulation of the plaintiff. Appeal by plaintiff dismissed, without costs. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11941: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Burris v. American Chicle Co.120 F.2d 218 (2d Cir. 1941)
  2. Gabriel v. Hallbrett Realty Corp.256 A.D. 705 (1939)

Most recent

  1. Burris v. American Chicle Co.120 F.2d 218 (2d Cir. 1941)
  2. Gabriel v. Hallbrett Realty Corp.256 A.D. 705 (1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list