TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Shay

In the Matter of Joseph A. Shay, an Attorney, Appellant; William Travers Jerome, District Attorney, Respondent

In re Shay, 89 N.E. 1112 (N.Y. 1909)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 26, 1909
Citations
89 N.E. 1112196 N.Y. 5301909 N.Y. LEXIS 896
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered September 18, 1909, which suspended Joseph A. Shay from practice as an attorney for the term of one year.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed on opinion of Ingraham, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 119362026peak 1936 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Disbarment Proceedings184 A. 59 (Pa. 1936)

Most recent

  1. In re Disbarment Proceedings184 A. 59 (Pa. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list