TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad

Thomas Lang Et Al., Appellants, v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Defendant, and the Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Respondent

Lang v. Brooklyn City R.R., 161 N.E. 178 (N.Y. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 20, 1928
Citations
161 N.E. 178247 N.Y. 5511928 N.Y. LEXIS 1146

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

*552 Concur: Crane, Andrews and O’Brien, JJ.; Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur upon the ground that the declaration of trust pleaded in the complaint does not create an interest in favor of the cestuis que trust in advance of recovery or collection by the trustee.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11935: 11941: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., of Perth v. Zerbe Construction Co.199 N.E. 89 (N.Y. 1935)
  2. Johanson Et Ux. v. Cudahy Packing Co.115 P.2d 794 (Utah 1941) · Dissent
  3. In re Bovard228 A.D. 263 (1930)

Most recent

  1. Johanson Et Ux. v. Cudahy Packing Co.115 P.2d 794 (Utah 1941) · Dissent
  2. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., of Perth v. Zerbe Construction Co.199 N.E. 89 (N.Y. 1935)
  3. In re Bovard228 A.D. 263 (1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list