TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Johnson v. Mulvy

Edward C. Johnson, Appellant, v. James Mulvy, Respondent

Johnson v. Mulvy, 51 N.Y. 634 (1872)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 5, 1872
Judges
Gray
Citations
51 N.Y. 634
Summary
This action was brought to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract for the purchase oí stock. Plaintiff’s brokers sold for him 400 shares of the stock of the Cumberland Coal Company, deliverable according to custom upon the next day. Defendant wrote a note to another firm of brokers notifying them of the purchase and requesting them to take the stock for him. Plaintiff’s brokers called upon said firm, who declined to take the stock as they had no funds of defendant as a margin. A day or two after plaintiff’s brokers addressed a note to defendant, stating that unless the stock was paid for by two p. m. of that day they would be compelled to sell it for his account. This note was not received by defendant until six p. m. The stock was sold by plaintiff the next day, leaving a deficiency of $3,500. Held, that there was no sufficient offer to deliver or refusal to take the stock, and that, therefore, plaintiff was not authorized to sell on defendant’s account and could not recover.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Gray

Gray, C., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1893: 11908: 118932026peak 1893 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sprague v. Hosie118 N.W. 497 (Mich. 1908)
  2. Cameron v. Tompkins30 Abb. N. Cas. 434 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1893)

Most recent

  1. Sprague v. Hosie118 N.W. 497 (Mich. 1908)
  2. Cameron v. Tompkins30 Abb. N. Cas. 434 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1893)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list