Lusk v. Peck
James L. Lusk, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Peck, Appellant, Impleaded With Another
Lusk v. Peck, 93 N.E. 1132 (N.Y. 1910)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 8, 190.9, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Geay, Haight and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Yann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Taking no part: Hiscook, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.