TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ehntholt v. McCarren

Daniel Ehntholt, Respondent, v. Hugh McCarren, Jr., Appellant

Ehntholt v. McCarren, 24 N.E. 942 (N.Y. 1890)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 3, 1890
Citations
24 N.E. 942120 N.Y. 6551890 N.Y. LEXIS 1349
Cited by 9
Summary
Appeal from judgment of tlie General Term of the City-Court, of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made Xovember 28, 188J, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a' verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1894: 11905: 11907: 11925: 11944: 11951: 11964: 21996: 118942026peak 1964 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Uni-Rty Corp. v. Guangdong Building Inc. (In re Uni-Rty Corp.)191 B.R. 595 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  2. Jasper v. Hazen23 L.R.A. 58 (N.D. 1894)
  3. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.104 N.W. 561 (Minn. 1905)
  4. 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp., Bankrupt. Jeremiah F. Cross, Trustee- v. A.G v. Associates, Inc.340 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1964)
  5. Kingsley v. Carroll234 P.2d 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
  6. Edner v. Mathews58 F. Supp. 486 (W.D. Pa. 1944)

Most recent

  1. Uni-Rty Corp. v. Guangdong Building Inc. (In re Uni-Rty Corp.)191 B.R. 595 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  2. 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp., Bankrupt. Jeremiah F. Cross, Trustee- v. A.G v. Associates, Inc.340 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1964)
  3. In re 716 Third Avenue Holding Corp.225 F. Supp. 268 (S.D.N.Y. 1964)
  4. Kingsley v. Carroll234 P.2d 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
  5. Edner v. Mathews58 F. Supp. 486 (W.D. Pa. 1944)
  6. Converse & Co. v. Commissioner1 B.T.A. 742 (B.T.A. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list