Cohen v. Rosalsky
In the Matter of the Claim of Morris Cohen Against Michael J. Rosalsky, Respondent. the State Industrial Board, Appellant
Cohen v. Rosalsky, 177 N.E. 177 (N.Y. 1931)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs against the State Industrial Board; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.