Jaillet v. Cashman
Gaston Jaillet, Appellant, v. Joseph Cashman, as Treasurer of Dow, Jones & Company, Respondent
Jaillet v. Cashman, 139 N.E. 714 (N.Y. 1923)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 5 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(Dow, Jones & Company not liable in negligence for incorrect information sent out over its ticker where no contractual or fiduciary relationship with plaintiff)
-
(Dow Jones & Co. not liable to subscriber for misinformation as to stock sent out over its ticker)
-
(publisher is not liable to one with whom it has no contract or fiduciary relationship for an unintentional mistake in its report)
-
(ticker tape provider not in privity with Dow Jones)
Cited by 37 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- Federal District Courts7
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts4
- State Appellate Courts9
- State Trial Courts11
- State Specialty Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- Vanguard Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. v. Cantor, Fitzgerald L.P.
- Brandt v. Weather Channel, Inc.
- Bailey v. Huggins Diagnostic & Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
- County of Orange v. McGraw-hill Companies, Inc. (In re County of Orange)
- LaSalle National Bank v. Duff & Phelps Credit Rating Co.
- First Equity Corporation of Florida, Robert Cornfeld and Floyd Watkins v. Standard & Poor's Corporation
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.