Gumperz v. Hofmann
Julian Gumperz, Respondent, v. Herbert Hofmann, Appellant
Gumperz v. Hofmann, 2 N.E.2d 687 (N.Y. 1936)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(trickery in service of process is permissible where the defendant had already voluntarily entered the forum state)
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- Federal District Courts2
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts10
- State Trial Courts4
- State Specialty Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.