In re the Arbitration Between Robinson & Robinson

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Belle Robinson, Appellant, and Barnett Robinson, Respondent

In re the Arbitration Between Robinson & Robinson, 71 N.E.2d 214 (N.Y. 1947)

Court: New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided: January 9, 1947
Citations: 71 N.E.2d 214296 N.Y. 7781947 N.Y. LEXIS 1569

Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division on the authority of Matter of Luttinger ( 294 N. Y. 855 ). No opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Bowmer v. Bowmer406 N.E.2d 760 (N.Y. 1980)
Hirsch v. Hirsch333 N.E.2d 371 (N.Y. 1975)
Schneider v. Schneider216 N.E.2d 318 (N.Y. 1966)
Sheets v. Sheets22 A.D.2d 176 (1964)
In re Hill199 Misc. 1035 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1951)
Swartz v. Swartz49 A.D.2d 254 (1975)

Most recent

Rakoszynski v. Rakoszynski174 Misc. 2d 509 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997)
Bowmer v. Bowmer406 N.E.2d 760 (N.Y. 1980)
Sokolsky v. Sokolsky59 A.D.2d 600 (1977)
Swartz v. Swartz49 A.D.2d 254 (1975)
Hirsch v. Hirsch333 N.E.2d 371 (N.Y. 1975)
Wertlake v. Wertlake318 A.2d 446 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	In re an Arbitration Between Luttinger & Luttinger, 62 N.E.2d 487 (N.Y. 1945)	11

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list