TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Kaufman

In the Matter of the Application of Samuel H. Kaufman Et Al., Individually and as Copartners Practicing Law Under the Firm Name of Kaufman Gallop Climenko Gould & Lynton, Appellants and Respondents. Ann R. Gonzalez, Respondent and Appellant

In re Kaufman, 78 N.E.2d 611 (N.Y. 1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 5, 1948
Citations
78 N.E.2d 611297 N.Y. 8141948 N.Y. LEXIS 930

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conwat, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1956: 11961: 11970: 11974: 119562026peak 1956 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kern v. Kern65 Misc. 2d 765 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1970)
  2. Matthews v. Matthews30 Misc. 2d 681 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)
  3. People ex rel. Sabbeth v. Sabbeth2 Misc. 2d 593 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
  4. Colmand v. Dailey80 Misc. 2d 133 (N.Y.C. Fam. Ct. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Colmand v. Dailey80 Misc. 2d 133 (N.Y.C. Fam. Ct. 1974)
  2. Kern v. Kern65 Misc. 2d 765 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1970)
  3. Matthews v. Matthews30 Misc. 2d 681 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1961)
  4. People ex rel. Sabbeth v. Sabbeth2 Misc. 2d 593 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list