TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Bateman

In the Matter of the Assignment of Arthur E. Bateman for the Benefit of Creditors. Claim of Lewis Clephane. [Fn]

In re Bateman, 40 N.E. 10 (N.Y. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 19, 1895
Citations
40 N.E. 10145 N.Y. 6231895 N.Y. LEXIS 890

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 625 FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed. *Page 626

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 119272026peak 1927 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City Bank20 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)

Most recent

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City Bank20 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list