TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lazenby v. International Cotton Mills Corporation

Francis A. Lazenby, Suing on Behalf of Himself and Other Stockholders of the International Cotton Mills Corporation, Plaintiff, v. International Cotton Mills Corporation Et Al., Respondents and Appellants. Kate B. Pitt Et Al., Appellants and Respondents

Lazenby v. Int'l Cotton Mills Corp., 123 N.E. 875 (N.Y. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 29, 1919
Citations
123 N.E. 875226 N.Y. 6451919 N.Y. LEXIS 1010
Summary
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 28, 1916, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought to set aside the voluntary dissolution of the New York company, which was consummated under the provisions of section 221 of the General Corporation Law of the state of New York; declare void and set aside a sale of the assets of the New York company made by the directors of that company, acting as trustees in liquidation thereof to the International Cotton Mills, a Massachusetts corporation; enjoin and direct a retransfer to the New York company of' the assets and cash sold and transferred to the Massachusetts corporation by the directors of the New York company; require the Massachusetts corporation and the individual defendants to account for the "property' and' assets of the New York company which'were'so transferred enjoin and. restrain the defendants from: Selling,, disposing of, incumbering "or in any way interfering with or exercising any ownership over the property so transferred or the proceeds or increases thereof. The complaint was dismissed upon the merits, provided that the defendants tender to the plaintiff and to the intervening plaintiffs, except Allein W. Bates, a total of 1,613.46 shares of • common stock of the defendant International Cotton Mills of Massachusetts. The Appellate Division modified the judgment by providing that plaintiffs should have an option, if they so desired, to take in cash the value of their stock in the International Cotton Mills Corporation of New York at the time of the reorganization, instead of the stock directed in the judgment to be tendered to them. In case the plaintiffs, or any of them, elected to take such value the same was to be determined by an appraisal under section 17 of the Stock Corporation Law.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and Crane, JJ. Absent: Hiscock, Ch. J. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1934: 11961: 21984: 119342026peak 1961 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list