TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ranalli v. Breed

Alice Ranalli, as Administratrix of the Estate of William J. Ranalli, Deceased, Appellant, v. Robert H. Breed Et Al., Respondents

Ranalli v. Breed, 14 N.E.2d 195 (N.Y. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 8, 1938
Citations
14 N.E.2d 195277 N.Y. 6301938 N.Y. LEXIS 1097

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court. The plaintiff contended that to hold the first, second, fifth and sixth causes of action alleged in her complaint are barred by section 50, subdivision 1, of" the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York would deprive plaintiff of property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held to the contrary.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1957: 11958: 31962: 21963: 11966: 11968: 11975: 11977: 11978: 11983: 119572026peak 1958 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Simcuski v. Saeli44 N.Y. 442 (1978)
  2. Borgia v. City of New York187 N.E.2d 777 (N.Y. 1962) · Dissent
  3. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.188 N.E.2d 142 (N.Y. 1963)
  4. Golia v. Health Insurance Plan6 A.D.2d 884 (1958)
  5. Naetzker v. Brocton Central School District50 A.D.2d 142 (1975)
  6. Manno v. Levi94 A.D.2d 556 (1983)

Most recent

  1. Manno v. Levi94 A.D.2d 556 (1983)
  2. Simcuski v. Saeli44 N.Y. 442 (1978)
  3. Simcuski v. Saeli57 A.D.2d 711 (1977)
  4. Naetzker v. Brocton Central School District50 A.D.2d 142 (1975)
  5. Troll v. Glantz57 Misc. 2d 572 (1968)
  6. Siegel v. Kranis52 Misc. 2d 78 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list