In re Peters
In the Matter of Matthew Peters, Appellant. Willis E. Heaton Et Al., Composing the Character Committee of the Third Judicial District, Respondent
In re Peters, 166 N.E. 337 (N.Y. 1929)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(admission denied because of disbarment in another state)
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.