Rosenberg v. General Realty Service, Inc.
Sol Rosenberg Et Al., Appellants and Respondents, v. General Realty Service, Inc., Et Al., Defendants, and Union Trust Company of Rochester, Respondent and Appellant
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Whenever a judgment has been entered in the County Clerk’s office on the order of the Appellate Division and the notice of appeal indicates an intention to bring up the determination of the Appellate Division for review, a misdescription of the judgment in the notice of appeal as an order or determination or decision affects no substantial right. The notice of appeal may be amended or the mistake disregarded as immaterial under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act.
*126 The order amending plaintiffs’ notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals herein should be affirmed, without costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Kellogg and Crouch, JJ., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.