Zuckman v. Donohue
In the Matter of Morris Zuckman Et Al., Appellants, Against Thomas F. Donohue Et Al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Albany County, Respondents, and John J. Kiley Et Al., Respondents
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: LoughbáN, Ch. J., Lewis, Conwat and Dte, JJ. DesmoNd and Fuld, JJ., dissent and vote to reinstate the order of Special Term in the following memorandum: “ The court, all agree, may review the facts and determine where the weight *629 of evidence lies (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 440, 602, 605). We with the majority in that we believe that the weight of evidence favors the determination made at Special Term. Taking no part: Thacher, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- Federal District Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts5
- State Trial Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Joseph Alexander and Daniel W. Ambrose, Respectively President and Secretary of the Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands, Acting on Behalf of the Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands v. Henrita Todman, Supervisor of Elections, Joseph Alexander and Daniel W. Ambrose, Respectively President and Secretaryof the Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands, Acting on Behalf of Thedemocratic Party of the Virgin Islands v. Henrita Todman, Supervisor of Elections, and Earle B. Ottley
- Echevarria v. Carey
- RIVERA v. Espada
- Alexander v. Todman
- People v. Ohrenstein
- Farrell v. Morrissey
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.