TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Frank Gunnar Williams

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Gunnar WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Williams, 600 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 16, 1979
Docket
No. 78-5413
Judges
Brown, Coleman, Goldberg, Ainsworth, Godbold, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Kravitch
Citations
600 F.2d 181979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13160
Disposition
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 11980: 21985: 11992: 119792026peak 1980 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Vicknair610 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1980)
  2. United States v. Elio Perez-Herrera, Luis Perez-Herrera and Domingo Perez-Barrio610 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1980)
  3. State v. Carter501 N.E.2d 1219 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985)
  4. United States v. Willis476 F. Supp. 201 (E.D. La. 1979)
  5. State v. Goodlow617 N.E.2d 720 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992)

Most recent

  1. State v. Goodlow617 N.E.2d 720 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992)
  2. State v. Carter501 N.E.2d 1219 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985)
  3. United States v. Vicknair610 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1980)
  4. United States v. Elio Perez-Herrera, Luis Perez-Herrera and Domingo Perez-Barrio610 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1980)
  5. United States v. Willis476 F. Supp. 201 (E.D. La. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list