United States v. United States District Court, Central District of California, Lawrence F. Lester, Real Party in Interest
UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. Lawrence F. LESTER, Real Party in Interest
Opinion
ORDER Before CHOY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.
The Government has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus. However, the United States has an alternative means of review, that is, appeal from a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . The challenge as to the district court’s failure to impose a special mandatory parole term possesses the necessary characteristics of “independence and completeness” that are required for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 without regard to the limitations of 18 U.S.C. § 3731 .
Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 406 , 77 S.Ct. 1332 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1442 (1957);
United States v. Busic, 592 F.2d 13, 25-26 , (2d Cir. 1978).
Therefore, the petition is denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 10 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(section 1291 authorizes government appeal of district court's failure to impose a special mandatory parole term)
-
(mandamus petitions do not lie where the government has an alternative means of review)
-
(mandamus denied because of availability of review under 28 U.S.C. § 1291)
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- United States v. Hetrick
- United States v. Hetrick
- United States v. William Hetrick, United States of America v. United States District Court, District of Arizona, and William Hetrick, Real Party in Interest
- United States v. William Hetrick, United States of America v. United States District Court, District of Arizona, and William Hetrick, Real Party in Interest
- United States v. Edmonson
- United States v. Robert L. Demier, Barbara Demier, in Re United States of America
Most recent
- United States v. Raphael Dwight Hundley
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Douglas, Leo, in No. 85-3488
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Douglas
- United States v. John Paul Edmonson, United States of America v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, and John Paul Edmonson, and Real Party in Interest
- United States v. Edmonson
- United States of America v. Thomas William Mayo
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.