TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. The Tappan Company

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. the TAPPAN COMPANY, Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. The Tappan Co., 607 F.2d 764 (6th Cir. 1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 18, 1979
Docket
No. 77-1306
Judges
Edwards, Lively, Peck
Citations
607 F.2d 764129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 22281979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11096

Opinion

ORDER This matter is before the court on application for enforcement and cross-petition for review of findings of the Board that Tappan violated Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(1) (1976). The Board’s decision and order are reported at 228 NLRB No. 176 . The contested Section 8(a)(1) violation was found on the basis of statements made by the vice-president for industrial relations of Tappan in a series of speeches to employees prior to an election which was lost by the union seeking to represent employees of Tappan at its Springfield, Tennessee plant. Though many of the statements by the company vice-president were protected speech and there was some internal inconsistency in the testimony of witnesses for the General Counsel, the court concludes that on the whole record the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the order of the Board is enforced and the cross-petition for review is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1997: 119972026peak 1997 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board113 F.3d 1259 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

Most recent

  1. Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board113 F.3d 1259 (D.C. Cir. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list