TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Enrique M. Salinas, Dan Sanchez, Jr. And Lewis Woodul

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique M. SALINAS, Dan Sanchez, Jr. and Lewis Woodul, Defendants-Appellants

United States v. Salinas, 610 F.2d 250 (5th Cir. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 21, 1980
Docket
No. 77-5824
Judges
Godbold, Simpson, Roney
Citations
610 F.2d 25055 A.L.R. Fed. 7241980 U.S. App. LEXIS 21192
Cited by 8 Original from court

Opinion — Per Curiam

*251 PER CURIAM:

The opinion of the court entered September 4, 1979, is amended by adding the following footnote, keyed to the end of the sentence terminating on the twentieth line, second column, p. 1291:

17½ The critical error occasioned by the erroneous instructions regarding the § 656 counts did not occur, either as to the § 371 conspiracy count (Count 1), or as to the § 1005 false entry counts upon which convictions of the several defendants were returned (Counts 30, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40,41 and 42).

For this reason, the convictions under the conspiracy counts and false entry counts are left standing by our disposition of this case. The record affords no basis for any conclusion that prejudice infected the guilty verdict as to these counts for reason of non-compliance with Rule 30, F.R.Crim.P.

The petition for rehearing on behalf of Dan Sanchez, Jr., and Lewis Woodul is DENIED and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16) the petition for rehearing en banc on behalf of said parties is DENIED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1981: 11982: 11985: 31989: 11990: 11997: 119812026peak 1985 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  2. United States v. Robert C. Thetford676 F.2d 170 (5th Cir. 1982)
  3. United States v. Raphael L. Gonzalez661 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1981)
  4. United States v. Norman Weissman, Joseph F. Maimone899 F.2d 1111 (11th Cir. 1990)
  5. United States v. Harris104 F.3d 1465 (5th Cir. 1997)
  6. United States v. Giovanni Lignarolo and Mario Lignarolo770 F.2d 971 (11th Cir. 1985)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Harris104 F.3d 1465 (5th Cir. 1997)
  2. United States v. Norman Weissman, Joseph F. Maimone899 F.2d 1111 (11th Cir. 1990)
  3. United States v. Everett Poarch878 F.2d 1355 (11th Cir. 1989)
  4. United States v. Giovanni Lignarolo and Mario Lignarolo770 F.2d 971 (11th Cir. 1985)
  5. United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  6. United States v. Jamiel Alexander Chagra754 F.2d 1186 (5th Cir. 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Salinas, 601 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir. 1979) 39

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list