TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barbara J. deWEEVER v. UNITED STATES of America

25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1762, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,245 Barbara J. Deweever v. United States

Barbara J. deWEEVER v. UNITED STATES of Am., 618 F.2d 685 (10th Cir. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 28, 1980
Docket
No. 78-1445
Judges
Barrett, Doyle, McKAY
Citations
618 F.2d 68525 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 17621980 U.S. App. LEXIS 1914727 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 32,245

Opinion — McKAY

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court properly awarded interest against the United States on a backpay award based on the 1972 Amendments to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which brought federal employees within the coverage of Title VII.

It is settled that interest may be assessed against the federal government only pursuant to express statutory or contractual authorization.

United States v. Alcea Band of Tiilamooks, 341 U.S. 48, 49 , 71 S.Ct. 552, 552 , 95 L.Ed. 738 (1951);

United States v. Goltra, 312 U.S. 203, 207 , 61 S.Ct. 487, 490 , 85 L.Ed. 776 (1941);

Smyth v. United States, 302 U.S. 329, 353 , 58 S.Ct. 248, 252 , 82 L.Ed. 294 (1937). The denial of interest absent express authority is based on sovereign immunity. We agree with the First and Third Circuits that Title VII as amended to include federal employees does not provide the necessary express statutory authorization for the award granted by the trial court.

Fischer v. Adams, 572 F.2d 406, 411 (1st Cir. 1978);

Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918, 925 (3rd Cir. 1977).

The judgment of the district court is reversed with directions to dismiss the petition for interest on the backpay award.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11981: 11982: 11984: 21985: 119802026peak 1984 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks, 341 U.S. 48 (1951) 112
Smyth v. United States, 302 U.S. 329 (1937) 74
United States v. Goltra, 312 U.S. 203 (1941) 70
Richerson v. Jones, 551 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1977) 215
Fischer v. Brock ADAMS, 572 F.2d 406 (1st Cir. 1978) 33

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list