TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Centrotextil

In Re CENTROTEXTIL, Petitioner

In re Centrotextil, 620 F.2d 690 (8th Cir. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 9, 1980
Docket
No. 80-1296
Judges
Stephenson, Henley, McMillian
Citations
620 F.2d 6901980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17708

Opinion

ORDER Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Honorable William L. Hungate, United States District Judge, from proceeding with trial of a case, No. 79-1017-C, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, wherein the district court has found jurisdiction over petitioner, allegedly a Yugoslavian concern, under Missouri’s long-arm statute. Mo.Ann.Stat. § 506.500 (Vernon). The order complained of overruled petitioner’s motion to dismiss the action against it for want of jurisdiction on April 9, 1980. Judge Hungate made no certification as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) and, indeed, from the materials before us it does not appear that he was asked to do so.

The petition for writ of prohibition, filed April 18, 1980, obviously involves an attempt to seek interlocutory review.

*691 Given a proper record on the jurisdictional issue we might well entertain an interlocutory appeal.

See and compare Hutson v. Fehr Bros., Inc., 584 F.2d 833 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 983 , 99 S.Ct. 573 , 58 L.Ed.2d 654 (1978). However, we should not ordinarily permit use of the extraordinary writ as a substitute for the interlocutory review procedure provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b), School Dist. of Kansas City v. State of Missouri, 592 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1979), and we decline to do so now.

The petition is dismissed without prejudice to resort to efforts to effect an interlocutory appeal.

See FRAP 5(a).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 22005: 119812026peak 1981 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Brown v. Danley, 439 U.S. 983 (1978) 52
Woodrow Hutson v. Fehr Bros., Inc., Acciaierie Weissenfels, John David Epperson v. Fehr Bros., Inc., Acciaierie Weissenfels, 584 F.2d 833 (8th Cir. 1978) 32
Sch. Dist. of Kan. City, Mo. v. Missouri, 592 F.2d 493 (8th Cir. 1979) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list