Wiley L. Bolden v. City of Mobile, Alabama
Opinion
626 F.2d 1324
Wiley L. BOLDEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 76-4210, 77-2042.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 15, 1980.
Charles B. Arendall, Jr., Mobile, Ala., Charles S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., William S. Rhyne, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellants.
J. U. Blacksher, Larry Menefee, Mobile, Ala., Edward Still, Birmingham, Ala., Jack Greenberg, Eric Schnapper, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Dennis J. Dimsey, Atty., Civil Rights Div., Appellate Sect., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Miriam R. Eisenstein, Brian K. Landsberg, Walter W. Barnett, Attys., Drew S. Days, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Appellate Section, Civil Rights Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae for United States.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before WISDOM, SIMPSON and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
The judgment heretofore entered by the District Court in this case is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's opinion in City of Mobile, Ala. v. Bolden, ---- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 1490 , 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.