TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

David L. Shepard, Jr. v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.

David L. SHEPARD, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Shepard v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc., 638 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 2, 1981
Docket
No. 76-4229
Judges
Gee, Hatchett, Per Curiam, Thornberry
Citations
638 F.2d 90931 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1001981 U.S. App. LEXIS 19747

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F.2d 231 , (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States);

Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1981: 11983: 219812026peak 1983 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list