TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

Billy GUICE and Howard Claxton, Sr., Petitioners-Appellants, v. Ray FORTENBERRY, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm, Respondent-Appellee

Guice v. Fortenberry, 642 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 26, 1981
Docket
No. 80-3350
Judges
Godbold, Brown, Coleman, Ainsworth, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjo-Flat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Garza, Henderson, Reavley, Pol-Itz, Hatchett, Anderson, Randall, Tate, Williams
Citations
642 F.2d 981981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856
Disposition
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC, (Opinion December 29, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 633 F.2d 699)
Cited by 0 Original from court

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list