Den Ex Dem. Burton v. Carruth
DEN Ex Dem. of ROBERT H. BURTON, Et. Al. v. JOHN CARRUTH
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Daniel, Judge, after stating the case as above, proceeded : — We are of opinion that the instruction given by the Judge was correct. The seven years continued perception of the profits of the land, by Wear under his deed, by cutting the grass off the meadow, and stacking it on the land and fencing the stacks, was a possession under circumstances, sufficiently capable in their nature of notifying all persons, that he was upon the land claiming it as his own, Den v. Mulford, 1 Hay. 320 ;
Grant v. Winborne, 2 Hay. 56 . 76. The claim, or entry of Gillespie, or his heirs, or any person claiming under him, was, by the act of 1715, - (Rev. ch.
2, sec. 4), perpetually barred ; and the title became perfect and complete in Wear, so as to enable him to convey to the lessors of the plaintiff.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.