TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Smith v. Barnhardt

J. Frank Smith, Walter L. Smith and C. W. Smith v. Walter J. Barnhardt and B. W. Blackwelder, Commissioner.

Smith v. Barnhardt, 161 S.E. 715 (N.C. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 8, 1932
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
161 S.E. 715202 N.C. 1061932 N.C. LEXIS 437

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam:.

In an action pending in the Superior Court of Cabarrus County, at February Term, 1929, between the plaintiffs in this action and the defendant, Walter J. Barnhardt, there was a final judgment, and a decree that the lands described in a deed of trust executed by plaintiffs to secure their note held by the defendant, Walter J. Barn-hardt, be sold and that the proceeds of said sale be applied as therein directed. B. W. Blackwelder was appointed in said decree as commissioner to sell said lands. In accordance with certain provisions of said decree, the said B. W. Blackwelder, commissioner, on 1 January, 1931, advertised said lands for sale on 2 February, 1931. This action was begun on 31 January, 1931, to restrain the said commissioner from selling'said lands in accordance with the decree rendered at February Term, 1929, of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County.

A temporary restraining order signed on 2 February, 1931, was dissolved at the hearing on 2 February, 1931. Plaintiffs excepted to the judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order and appealed to this Court.

We find no error in the judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order. The fact that the defendant, W. J. Barnhardt is in possession of the lands described in the deed of trust, under a lease executed by the plaintiffs, is immaterial. No sale of said lands will be consummated until same has been confirmed by the Superior Court.

If plaintiffs are entitled to any relief on the facts alleged in their complaint, such relief may be had by an order in the action in which the decree for the sale of their lands was rendered. It cannot be had in this action. The judgment is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Swinson v. Nance15 S.E.2d 284 (N.C. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Swinson v. Nance15 S.E.2d 284 (N.C. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list