TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon v. General Telephone Company of the Southwest

25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon, Cross-Appellant v. General Telephone Company of the Southwest, Cross-Appellee

25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1735, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. Falcon v. Gen. Tel. Co. of the Southwest, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: rev'd, Gen. Tel. Co. of Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147 (1982). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 24, 1981
Docket
No. 78-3587
Citations
647 F.2d 633

Opinion

647 F.2d 633 25 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1735 , 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,062 Mariano S. FALCON, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF the SOUTHWEST, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 78-3587.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 29, 1981. On Rehearing June 24, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 23, 1981.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Sarah Tilghman Hughes, Judge.

E. Russell Nunnally, Dallas, Tex., Stephen W. Holt, San Angelo, Tex., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

John E. Collins, Irving, Tex., Frank P. Hernandez, Garland, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee cross-appellant.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Before TUTTLE, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

The judgment of this Court in this case having been vacated by the Supreme Court 101 S.Ct. 1752 , and remanded for further consideration in light of Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. --, 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d -- (1981), the case is now remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Burdine.

The Court did not deal with that part of our prior judgment that decided or remanded non-Burdine issues for further consideration of the trial court. We, therefore, reinstate Parts IV and V of our original opinion.

REMANDED.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING 1

It appearing that in our Order of May 29, 1981, we did not fully specify our non-Burdine issues, we now amend the last sentence of that Order to read as follows: We therefore, reinstate parts I, II, IV, V and VI of our original opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Falcon v. Gen. Tel. Co. of Southwest, 647 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1981) 1
Tex. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981) 14,548

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list