Taylor v. Dickens
Francis Taylor v. William Dickens and Others.
Taylor v. Dickens, 16 N.C. 71 (1827)
Summary
From Orange.
Upon opening the papers in this case, his honor Judge Ham observed, that it did not appear from them, that publication had been made, as to some of the persons named in the bill as defendants, although it had been frequently ordered; that replications had been filed to the answers of Vickins and Langston, but there was no order setting the cause down for hearing, without which it was premature, under the act of 1818, (Revísale. 962, s. 5) to transfer it to this Court.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Pur Curiam.
— Let the cause be remanded to the Court below, and let the party removing pay the costs of this Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.