TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1717, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,263 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Raymond Williams, Willie McKay Marion J. Eaddy, Randolph Hughes, Jr., Ariel Brownlee, William Bostic, Kenneth Howard, Alpha Christmas, Ronald Richardson, Clarence Winder, Ronald Crawford, and Frank Gilchrist, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania, and the State of Delaware General Building Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, United Contractors Association, and Pennsylvania Excavating Contractors Association, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and Glasgow, Inc., on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers, in No. 80-2159. Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania, and the State of Delaware, In

28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1717, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,263 Commonwealth of Pa. & Raymond Williams, Willie McKay Marion J. Eaddy, Randolph Hughes, Jr., Ariel Brownlee, William Bostic, Kenneth Howard, Alpha Christmas, Ronald Richardson, Clarence Winder, Ronald Crawford, & Frank Gilchrist, on Their Own Behalf & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Local Union 542, 648 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 19, 1981
Docket
No. 80-2160
Citations
648 F.2d 922

Opinion

648 F.2d 922 28 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1717 , 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,263 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Raymond Williams, Willie McKay, Marion J. Eaddy, Randolph Hughes, Jr., Ariel Brownlee, William Bostic, Kenneth Howard, Alpha Christmas, Ronald Richardson, Clarence Winder, Ronald Crawford, and Frank Gilchrist, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS; Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania, and the State of Delaware; General Building Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, United Contractors Association, and Pennsylvania Excavating Contractors Association, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Glasgow, Inc., on its own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers, Appellant in No. 80-2159. Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania, and the State of Delaware, Appellant in

No. 80-2160.

Nos. 80-2159, 80-2160.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 24, 1981. Reargued In Banc May 12, 1981. Decided May 19, 1981.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Louis C. Bechtle, J.

1

Marvin I. Barish and Gordon Gelfond (argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants Local Union 542 and Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee.

2

John J. McAleese, Jr., Thomas J. McGoldrick (argued), D. Richard Powell, Jr., Luis A. Minella, Cuniff, Bray & McAleese, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., for appellants Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee.

3

Harold I. Goodman (argued) and Germaine Ingram, Community Legal Services, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., for Individually Named and Class Appellees.

4

Joel M. Ressler, Louis J. Rovelli, Margaret Hunting, Deputy Attys. Gen., LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

5

Argued Feb. 24, 1981.

6

Before WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, Judge, Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. * 7

Reargued May 12, 1981 In Banc.

8

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, ALDISERT, GIBBONS, HUNTER, WEIS, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

9

Essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinions of the district court, see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, 469 F.Supp. 329 (E.D.Pa.1978); 488 F.Supp. 988 (E.D.Pa.1979); 502 F.Supp. 7 (E.D.Pa.1979), and to the extent that the judgment of the district court is challenged by these appeals, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

* The Honorable Jack R. Miller, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Washington, D. C., sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 648 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1981) 1
Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 469 F. Supp. 329 (E.D. Pa. 1978) 35
Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 502 F. Supp. 7 (E.D. Pa. 1979) 10
Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 488 F. Supp. 988 (E.D. Pa. 1980) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list