TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Elliott v. Board of Commissioners

Edna Elliott v. Board of Commissioners of Lexington.

Elliott v. Bd. of Comm'rs, 160 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 10, 1931
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
160 S.E. 924201 N.C. 8381931 N.C. LEXIS 138

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This is a civil action prosecuted by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in allowing the ground wire on a power pole to become charged with electricity. The Lexington Moving Picture Company was made a party defendant, but at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence its motion for nonsuit was granted.

The plaintiff lived on a lot contiguous to Second Avenue and Marble Alley. For a number of years the defendant has maintained a .line of poles and wires to and in the alley. On one of the poles there was a ground wire which was not insulated. The plaintiff and her husband lived with her father and mother on the lot in question. The plaintiff’s mother, Mrs. Harris, undertook to lead a cow from the barn into the alley by means of a chain connected with a leather halter which was fastened to the cow’s head. Without fault on the part of Mrs. Harris the chain came in contact with the ground wire which was charged with *839 electricity and the current was transmitted to the chain. The plaintiff seeing that her mother had been shocked and incapacitated by the current sought to rescue her and in doing so was herself electrified and seriously injured. For this injury she brought suit and the jury answered the two issues of negligence and damages in her favor. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and the defendant excepted and appealed.

Upon an inspection of the appellant’s assignments of error we find no satisfactory reason for granting a new trial. The principles applicable to the controversy are discussed in Small v. Utilities Co., 200 N. C., 719 , Ramsey v. Power Co., 195 N. C., 788 , and McAllister v. Pryor, 187 N. C., 832 .

No error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lynch v. Telephone Co.167 S.E. 847 (N.C. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Lynch v. Telephone Co.167 S.E. 847 (N.C. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Small v. Southern Pub. Utils. Co., 158 S.E. 385 (N.C. 1931) 27
McAllister v. Pryor, 123 S.E. 92 (N.C. 1924) 20
Ramsey v. Carolina-Tenn. Power Co., 143 S.E. 861 (N.C. 1928) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list