Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.
Owen H. Roberts and D. B. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Company.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
AlleN, J.
The causes of action that may be joined are classified im section 507 of the Consolidated Statutes, which concludes: “Rut the-causes of action' so united must all belong to one of these classes, and except in actions for the foreclosure of mortgages, must affect all the-parties to the action.”
It is also well settled that an action cannot be divided under section 516 when there is a misjoinder both of parties and of causes of action, and that in such case the demurrer must be sustained and the action dismissed.
Cromartie v. Parker, 121 N. C., 198 ;
Morton v. Tel. Co., 130 N. C., 299 ;
Thigpen v. Cotton Mills, 151 N. C., 97 ;
Campbell v. Power Co., 166 N. C., 488 .
Applying these principles it is clear that the demurrer ought to have-been sustained.
There are two plaintiffs, Owen IT. Roberts and D. B. Roberts, and there are at least three causes of action set out, all of which do not affect all of the parties to the action, as required by the statute.
The plaintiffs allege, first, a breach of- a contract made by the defendant with O. H. Roberts, and assigned by him to the other plaintiff,. D. B. Roberts. Next, a breach of a separate and distinct contract made by the defendant with both of the plaintiffs, and in the third place, a breach of a contract made by the defendant with the plaintiff, O. EL, Roberts.
Reversed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 29 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.