TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.

Owen H. Roberts and D. B. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Company.

Roberts v. Util. Mfg. Co., 106 S.E. 664 (N.C. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 6, 1921
Judges
AlleN
Citations
106 S.E. 664181 N.C. 2041921 N.C. LEXIS 42
Headnotes
Actions — Parties—Causes of Action — Statutes—Demurrer—Pleadings. Causes of action may not be united under the provisions of C. S., 507, except those for the foreclosure of mortgages, unless they affect all the parties thereto, nor can they be divided under C. S., 516, when there is a misjoinder both of parties and causes of action, and when there is a cause of action alleged against one defendant assigned by him to one of the plaintiffs, and a breach of a separate contract made by him with both of the plaintiffs, and also a breach of another contract made with one of the_ plaintiffs, a demurrer thereto for misjoinder of parties and causes of action is good.
Summary
Appeal by defendant from Cranmer, J., from New Hanoveb, heard at Wilson, October Term, 1920. This is an appeal from a judgment overruling a demurrer to the complaint, the ground of demurrer being that there is a misjoinder of. parties and causes of action.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — AlleN

AlleN, J.

The causes of action that may be joined are classified im section 507 of the Consolidated Statutes, which concludes: “Rut the-causes of action' so united must all belong to one of these classes, and except in actions for the foreclosure of mortgages, must affect all the-parties to the action.”

It is also well settled that an action cannot be divided under section 516 when there is a misjoinder both of parties and of causes of action, and that in such case the demurrer must be sustained and the action dismissed.

Cromartie v. Parker, 121 N. C., 198 ;

Morton v. Tel. Co., 130 N. C., 299 ;

Thigpen v. Cotton Mills, 151 N. C., 97 ;

Campbell v. Power Co., 166 N. C., 488 .

Applying these principles it is clear that the demurrer ought to have-been sustained.

There are two plaintiffs, Owen IT. Roberts and D. B. Roberts, and there are at least three causes of action set out, all of which do not affect all of the parties to the action, as required by the statute.

The plaintiffs allege, first, a breach of- a contract made by the defendant with O. H. Roberts, and assigned by him to the other plaintiff,. D. B. Roberts. Next, a breach of a separate and distinct contract made by the defendant with both of the plaintiffs, and in the third place, a breach of a contract made by the defendant with the plaintiff, O. EL, Roberts.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 29 cases

View all citing references →
1921: 21923: 31924: 11925: 11926: 21927: 21928: 11930: 11934: 11935: 11937: 11938: 11939: 11940: 11942: 21944: 11950: 31954: 11956: 11960: 11963: 119212026peak 1923 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Casey v. Grantham79 S.E.2d 735 (N.C. 1954)
  2. Morton v. Thornton131 S.E.2d 378 (N.C. 1963)
  3. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land Bank196 S.E. 481 (N.C. 1938)
  4. Burleson v. Burleson7 S.E.2d 706 (N.C. 1940)
  5. Lillian Knitting Mills Co. v. Earle62 S.E.2d 492 (N.C. 1950)
  6. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.59 S.E.2d 2 (N.C. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Morton v. Thornton131 S.E.2d 378 (N.C. 1963)
  2. Gaines v. Atlas Plywood Corp.116 S.E.2d 427 (N.C. 1960)
  3. Tart v. Byrne90 S.E.2d 692 (N.C. 1956)
  4. Casey v. Grantham79 S.E.2d 735 (N.C. 1954)
  5. Lillian Knitting Mills Co. v. Earle62 S.E.2d 492 (N.C. 1950)
  6. Snotherly v. Jenrette61 S.E.2d 708 (N.C. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Morton v. Western Union Tel. Co., 41 S.E. 484 (N.C. 1902) 27
Thigpen v. Kinston Cotton Mills, 65 S.E. 750 (N.C. 1909) 21
Campbell v. Wash. Light & Power Co., 82 S.E. 842 (N.C. 1914) 16
State ex rel. Cromartie v. Parker, 28 S.E. 297 (N.C. 1897) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list