TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.

Silver Valley Mining Company v. the Baltimore Mining Company.

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co., 8 S.E. 361 (N.C. 1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 5, 1888
Judges
Smith
Citations
8 S.E. 361101 N.C. 679
Headnotes
From Davidson Superior Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Smith

Smith, C. J.

This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal.

Silver Valley Co.

v. Baltimore Co., 99 N. C., 445 . After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm, the .judgment.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1920: 119202026peak 1920 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lanier v. Pullman Co.105 S.E. 21 (N.C. 1920)

Most recent

  1. Lanier v. Pullman Co.105 S.E. 21 (N.C. 1920)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Silver Valley Mining v. Baltimore Smelting, 6 S.E. 735 (N.C. 1888) 13

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list