State v. Pugh.
State v. . Pugh
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.
The defendant was convicted of the larceny of a suit of clothes, and sentenced to ten years in the State’s Prison. The only evidence was that a sailor accused the defendant of having stolen his suit of clothes out of a bag which the defendant was carrying for him, and the defendant denied the' charge when made. The Judge should have charged the jury, as requested, that there was no evidence. The sailor was not at the trial, nor was there any witness who testified to any circumstances bearing upon the alleged commission of the offense. The remark of the sailor was hearsay, and was only competent ,as a quasi admission if the defendant had failed to deny the charge. This the defendant did promptly when so charged, and also went upon the stand and denied it at the trial. There was not the scintilla of any evidence against him.
Error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.