TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moffitt v. Assurance Society

L. R. Moffitt v. the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States.

Moffitt v. Assurance Soc'y, 176 S.E. 244 (N.C. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 10, 1934
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
176 S.E. 244207 N.C. 8591934 N.C. LEXIS 513

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Civil action to recover on certificate of group insurance, tried upon the following issue:

"1. Was the employment of the plaintiff L. R. Moffitt by American Enka Corporation in effect on 25 February, 1932, as alleged? Answer: `No.'"

Plaintiff testified that he worked for the defendant until 4 February, 1932. He seeks to recover for an injury sustained on 25 February, 1932.

Judgment on the verdict for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors. The certificate in suit automatically terminated, for present purposes, when plaintiff ceased to be an employee of the defendant. This was the theory upon which the case was tried. The issue is sufficient in form to settle the matter. The verdict and judgment will be upheld. Boozer v. Assurance Society , 206 N.C. 848 ; Perry v. Assurance Society , 206 N.C. 122 , 172 S.E. 527 ; Deese v. Ins. Co. , 204 N.C. 214 , 167 S.E. 797 .

No error.

SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Deese v. Travellers Ins., 167 S.E. 797 (N.C. 1933) 12
Perry v. Assurance Soc'y, 172 S.E. 527 (N.C. 1934) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list