State v. Rivers
State v. Ralph Rivers.
Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.
The record discloses that on 15 May, 1943, the defendant shot and killed his father-in-law at the defendant’s home near Burlington, Alamance County, while the two were quarreling over some trivial domestic matters. The defendant admitted firing the shot which killed the deceased, but he says he shot to repel an assault without any felonious intent. The’ issue was for the jury under the evidence disclosed by the record, and they have found an unlawful killing or manslaughter. The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled. G. S., 15-173 (formerly C. S., 4643);
S. v. Johnson, 184 N. C., 637 , 113 S. E., 617 ;
S. v. Satterfield, 198 N. C., 682 , 153 S. E., 155 .
The remaining' exceptions are to portions of the charge. No authority is cited in support of the defendant’s position, and we have found no error in the trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.