Johnson v. Harriet Mills, Inc.
FRANCES JOHNSON, Administratrix of Maurice Johnson, Deceased, v. THE HARRIET MILLS, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Per Oubiam.
C. S., 900, provides that “where a corporation is a party to the action, this examination may be made of any of its officers or agents.” When no pleadings have been filed the plaintiff by proper and sufficient affidavit may apply to the court for an order of examination.
Bailey v. Matthews, 156 N. C., 78 , 72 S. E., 92 ;
Fields v. Coleman, 1 60 N. C., 11 , 75 S. E., 1005 ;
Chesson v. Bank, 190 N. C., 187 , 129 S. E., 403 . And when a proper order for such examination has been duly made, an appeal therefrom to the Supreme Court is premature and will be dismissed.
Ward v. Martin, 175 N. C., 287 , 95 S. E., 621 ;
Monroe v. Holder, 182 N. C., 79 , 108 S. E., 359 ;
Abbitt v. Gregory, ante, 9.
Appeal dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.