TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jenkins v. Carson

E. L. JENKINS v. C. S. CARSON Et Als.

Jenkins v. Carson, 92 S.E. 328 (N.C. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 9, 1917
Judges
OuRiam
Citations
92 S.E. 328173 N.C. 7251917 N.C. LEXIS 396
Headnotes
Appeal and Error — Settlement of Case — Statutes. Revisal; sec. 591, prescribing the manner of service and settlement of cases on appeal to the Supreme Court must he strictly or at least substantially complied with, or the case may be dismissed. The Court examined the record in this appeal and found no substantial or reversible error.
Summary
Civil agtiow, tried before Cline, J., at January Term, 1917, of GastoN.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — OuRiam

PeR OuRiam.

There is no case on appeal in this record of which we can take notice. There is a paper purporting to be a case prepared and signed by defendants’ attorneys, but it does not appear to have been served on the plaintiff or his counsel, or even tendered. There is no acceptance of service, and no return of an officer as to service, and no other compliance with statutory requirements. Revisal, sec. 591.

We *726 have beld tbat there must be strict, or at least substantial, compliance with the statute. Pell’s Revisal, pp. 591, 592, and cases cited. There are no assignments of errors based upon exceptions. The charge of the court, though exceptions were taken to it, is not in the paper assumed to be a case. Plaintiff has not appeared in this Court or filed a brief.

But notwithstanding these irregularities, we have examined the record, and the statements and exceptions contained in the case prepared for tender to the plaintiff, and find no substantial or reversible error. -The case appears to have been properly tried on its legal merits.

No error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list