State v. Hargrave

The State v. Caldwell Hargrave

State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466 (1871)

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided: June 5, 1871
Judges: Boyden
Citations: 65 N.C. 466

Headnotes

Under the act of February 22nd, 1861, acts of 1860-’61, chap.-, the least penetration of the person of a female against her will, constitutes the crime of rape.

Summary

This was an indictment for rape, tried before Logan, J., at Spring Term, 1871, of Gaston Superior Court. The prosecutrix testified that she had been thrown down by the prisoner, and that he then had his will with her and effected a penetration of her person, and in consequence thereof she was rendered very sore in her body, that she was aged sixteen years, and that no blood was found upon her person or clothing. The defendant’s counsel intimated that the evidence was not sufficient to constitute the crime of rape, that there was no such penetration as required by law, since the hymen wras not broken. His Honor charged the jury that any, the slightest penetration was sufficient to constitute the crime, and that it was unnecessary that the hymen should be broken. To which the prisoner excepted. Yerdict of guilty. Judgment and appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Boyden

Boyden, J.

There is no error. His Honor left it to the jury, upon the testimony, to find whether there had been any penetration ; stating that any, the least penetration was sufficient to constitute the crime of rape, and that it was not necessary to constitute this crime, that the hymen should be ruptured. His Honor was well warranted by authority in thus charging the jury. See 9 Carrington & Payne 572 and note, Bishop’s Criminal Law, Vol. 2, Sec. 1078, American Criminal Law, Vol. 2, Section 1138.

*467 In the case of the State v. Grey & Jones, decided at December Term, 1860, it was held that to constitute the crime of rape there must be proof of emission, as well as penetration, to constitute this crime.

The act of the 29th February, 1861, changed the law and enacted that the offence of rape “ should be claimed and taken in law to be complete upon proof of penetration ‘ only.’ ”

There being no error, this will be certified, that the Court may proceed to judgment agreeable to law.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social Services679 P.2d 976 (Wyo. 1984)
State v. Johnson347 S.E.2d 7 (N.C. 1986)
State v. Jones105 S.E.2d 513 (N.C. 1958)
State v. Carnagy76 N.W. 805 (Iowa 1898)
State v. Murry176 S.E.2d 738 (N.C. 1970)
State v. Bowman61 S.E.2d 107 (N.C. 1950)

Most recent

Romulus v. Romulus715 S.E.2d 308 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011)
State v. Johnson347 S.E.2d 7 (N.C. 1986)
LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social Services679 P.2d 976 (Wyo. 1984)
McDonald v. State512 S.W.2d 636 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1974)
State v. Murry176 S.E.2d 738 (N.C. 1970)
State v. Jones105 S.E.2d 513 (N.C. 1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list