TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mullen v. Canal Co.

F. M. Mullen v. Norfolk and North Carolina Canal Company.

Mullen v. Canal Co., 20 S.E. 167 (N.C. 1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 5, 1894
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
20 S.E. 167115 N.C. 15

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8 . It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan , 110 N.C. 250 , and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.

Petition dismissed.

Cited: Weisel v. Cobb , 122 N.C. 70 ; Hodgin v. Bank , 125 N.C. 503 , 511 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Hudson v. Jordan, 14 S.E. 741 (N.C. 1892) 8
Mullen v. Norfolk & Carolina Canal Co., 19 S.E. 106 (N.C. 1894) 8
Hodgin v. Bank, 34 S.E. 709 (N.C. 1899) 6
Cowan v. Phillips, 28 S.E. 961 (N.C. 1898) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list