TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nance v. Hulin

C. H. Nance v. J. A. and J. H. Hulin.

Nance v. Hulin, 148 S.E. 38 (N.C. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 15, 1929
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
148 S.E. 38197 N.C. 2221929 N.C. LEXIS 196

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The evidence presents an issue of fact and no more. No reversible error is pointed out, and the burden to show such error is upon the appellant.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 11944: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown ex rel. Webb v. Wood160 S.E. 281 (N.C. 1931)
  2. Hertford Banking Co. v. Stokes29 S.E.2d 24 (N.C. 1944)

Most recent

  1. Hertford Banking Co. v. Stokes29 S.E.2d 24 (N.C. 1944)
  2. Brown ex rel. Webb v. Wood160 S.E. 281 (N.C. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nance v. Hulin, 135 S.E. 774 (N.C. 1926) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list