State v. Carpenter
State v. Arthur Carpenter.
State v. Carpenter, 137 S.E. 869 (N.C. 1927)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The defendant’s exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious “blind tiger” could not have availed the defendant. .
S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333 . There was evidence that the defendant’s admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant’s possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400 . The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.
No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.