State v. Muse
State v. Jim Muse.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. Fore, 180 N. C., 744 . A State statute in further- *507 anee of, and not in conflict with, the Federal prohibition law may be declared a valid exercise of the police power of the State and is sanctioned, in express terms, by the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
No error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.