Duke v. Markham
[Fn] W. Duke v. F. D. Markham.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Clakií, J.:
The Code, § 685, provides that “ any conveyance of its property, whether absolutely or upon condition, in trust or by way of mortgage, executed by any corporation, shall be void and of no effect as to the creditors of said corporation existing prior to or at the time of the execution of said deed,” provided such creditors shall commence proceedings to enforce the claims against said corporation within sixty days after the registration of such conveyance. It is not controverted here that the defendant, as Sheriff, seized the property of the corporation under valid executions against it, which were already in his hands when the mortgage under which plaintiff claims was executed.' The statute is explicit, and the power of the Legislature to enact it is unquestioned. The argument ah ineonvenienti was *140 forcibly presented by the appellant’s counsel. That is a matter which addresses itself to the legislative department and not to the Courts. It is sufficient for us to say, “Ita scripia eat lex.”
The Court below properly held the mortgage void as to executions in defendant’s hands.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.